Doerak wrote:The guys from Grid (Vidvox) are really hyping this Sheer codec for VJ-ing. Is this just marketing or does it really have advantages? Unfortunately I'm not such a video guru that I can test this myself. Can somebody enlighten me?[/url]
Doerak wrote:So it boils down to:
Sheer (compared to PhotoJPG) will decrease your performance by a little, but increase the quality of your images by a lot.
Akira wrote:I use MJPEG at 100% and I am pretty satisfied with it. You think PhotoJPEG would do better?
The thing that always oried me most about compression is how flat colors lok. I use a lot of flat stuff in my motion graphic designs, and anything but MJPEG @ 100% blurred things, specially if you used red!
Anonymous wrote:Howdy,
David from Vidvox here!
Just thought I'd pop in and post our findings and give our little bit about why we think Sheer is so great. As a note, we don't see a single dime from BitJazz. We really think it is an awesome codec that let's you work with video in real-time without a visible loss in quality.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 36 guests
Copyright 2017 © garageCube. All Rights Reserved. Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited.