Hap is "not better". It is another compromise.orion wrote:cause it's new does it mean it's better?
HAP is also using far more disk bandwidth, so this could also be the limiting factor.gmint wrote:For me, HAP was noticeably slower than PhotoJPEG. I attribute that to the fact that my video cards are probably already running pretty close to all out and really don't need another tas
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 1 guest