For live manipulation, Photo JPG is still the preferred choice because it does not compress over time. H.264 could be a good solution as long as you simply read a high res long movie from disk. As soon as you start changing the rate, the play direction or scratch the movie, performances are much lower than Photo JPG.Now that Tiger's been out for a while, any reports on H.264 codec performance compared to Photo JPG?
Cheers,
N
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 63 guests
Copyright 2017 © garageCube. All Rights Reserved. Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited.