Page 1 of 1
Triplehead2Go or Dualhead2Go?
Posted: Sun Nov 18, 2012 9:58 am
by AgentD
Hi,
I need to do a video mapping onto a building wall for one night. My plan is to have two projectors to map the entire wall. I want to be able to control the visuals during the night which means I need one display for the madmapper/modul8 interface and two others for the projectors. Does that mean that I should get Triplhead2Go instead of Dualhead2Go? My MBP is from mid 2010. Thank you millions for your suggestions in advance!
AgentD
Re: Triplehead2Go or Dualhead2Go?
Posted: Sun Nov 18, 2012 11:23 am
by scaryxpuppy
Hi there
A DUAL HEAD will do as you use your MacBook screen for control.
It's worth thinking ahead though and maybe spending the little bit more to get a TRIPLE HEAD just in case you need a 3 projector event in the future.
Have fun
Phil
Re: Triplehead2Go or Dualhead2Go?
Posted: Sun Nov 18, 2012 12:43 pm
by MGrinder
If it's in your budget I'd think about a Datapath x4. It'll give you a lot more flexibility in what pixel space you send to each output. That'll allow you to do 2 wide blends at 1920, 4 wide at 720, any number of goofy resolutions for LED or other custom displays, or 4 way DA in a pinch. It's a pretty handy box.
Re: Triplehead2Go or Dualhead2Go?
Posted: Sun Nov 18, 2012 12:59 pm
by scaryxpuppy
Is the DATAPATH fully useable with Mac OSX?
Re: Triplehead2Go or Dualhead2Go?
Posted: Sun Nov 18, 2012 1:02 pm
by scaryxpuppy
..... also, is the blend software included, or do you have to go through a BLENDPRO etc etc?
All help gladly appreciated
PHIL
Re: Triplehead2Go or Dualhead2Go?
Posted: Mon Nov 19, 2012 2:29 am
by lotech
The Datapath with work with any OS. The unfortunate thing is that the best way of controlling the positions of your output is via a Windows program. You can control it in OS-X via terminal but who can be bothered. I just deal with it by having a VM of Windows XP installed on my VJ drive.
The Datapath doesn't do any processing/blending - which helps it have nearly zero latency. Hopefully MadMapper will add some sort of software blending (like Millumin) sooner or later.
Re: Triplehead2Go or Dualhead2Go?
Posted: Mon Nov 19, 2012 12:12 pm
by franz
and how much is a datapath ?
Re: Triplehead2Go or Dualhead2Go?
Posted: Mon Nov 19, 2012 3:34 pm
by vj granda
Re: Triplehead2Go or Dualhead2Go?
Posted: Mon Nov 19, 2012 3:39 pm
by scaryxpuppy
.... and won't do blending directly !
Good for video walls, but for mapping I'm not so sure !
Re: Triplehead2Go or Dualhead2Go?
Posted: Mon Nov 19, 2012 6:55 pm
by franz
wow ... much more expensive than a TH2Gdp ...
but ... accepts inputs up to 4k*4k ... interesting
Re: Triplehead2Go or Dualhead2Go?
Posted: Mon Nov 19, 2012 10:36 pm
by MGrinder
I paid just over $1000 for my x4. I had to go the old school route and actually speak to a sales guy on the phone but the price was considerably lower than ordering direct from a website and paying full retail. Still not as cheap as a Matrox but I feel it's more reliable. I'd rather have a box that does no processing whatsoever, it has one job, to define pixel spaces, and I have plenty of other places in the signal path to do the warping and blending.
Re: Triplehead2Go or Dualhead2Go?
Posted: Tue Nov 27, 2012 12:56 am
by AgentD
To be safe I'll ask for Triplehead2Go. Thanks for your tips!